I backed the funding campaign to support people's right to express their views about gender self-ID. I don't have set views on the issue, + don't know the details of the case. But working through the pros+cons requires space for reasoned debate https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/lost-job-speaking-out … @MForstater
-
Thanks, Maya. After your feedback, I did some reflecting and more importantly, research, on the use of the term TERF and I respectfully disagree. Words that we commonly use (like even "feminist" - a term I use proudly!) can be used in a derogatory way.
Unlike 'Feminist' TERF is *generally* intended as an insult (with or without the violent threats) and a means to tell others to ignore and avoid. As you used it "Engaging with - *these people* - is fruitless" so yeah, in the spirit of respectful dialogue 
do go on....
-
-
I argue that the risks & negative impacts *to women & girls* of allowing male bodied ppl who self identify as women to access women's spaces, sports & programmes hv been underexplored /ignored by the orgs promoting this policy... You both say I shouldn't give this one sided view
-
The other side would be "you are wrong/you are ignoring this analysis by orgs that have seriously considered the impacts on women & girls... read their assessment here... ". I cannot find this anywhere. I would love to hear and present this other side.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.