But sex and identity are not the same thing and require separate questions. Biological sex is an important demographic variable needed to record & plan services and understand different population trends. @NatRecordsScot themselves say this
-
Show this thread
-
So the sex question should stay binary. Non binary people can express their identity in the trans question. Non binary people still have a physical sex. I note that non binary is listed as part of Stonewall's "trans umbrella". It's an identity.
15 replies 89 retweets 856 likesShow this thread -
Individual census returns remain confidential for 100 years. Many respondants might find other mandatory questions about illness, ethnicity & personal circumstances sensitive and difficult. But they answer them knowing their privacy is protected.
3 replies 61 retweets 685 likesShow this thread -
During evidence I asked
@LGBTIScotland how@PippaBunce should answer the census sex question if they identified as woman one day and man the next. I was told they would be non binary. But Bunce still has a biological sex which would then not be recorded.8 replies 85 retweets 726 likesShow this thread -
Recording birth sex is important to monitor sex discrimination and the Equality Act 2010. Women experience discrimination on the basis of biology, not how they identify (although trans people experience discrimination too, it is of a different type)
21 replies 194 retweets 1,219 likesShow this thread -
The census sets an important precedent. How can we defend the Equality Act, which clearly gives women protections based on biological sex, if we have said this definition of sex is irrelevant to our largest data gathering exercise?
3 replies 140 retweets 955 likesShow this thread -
Sex exemptions in the Equality Act are vital for privacy & dignity in shared spaces also "occupation exemptions" for jobs supporting vulnerable females. This matters as more men self ID as women while retaining male bodies and male genitals
10 replies 120 retweets 828 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AlexSharpe64
Joan McAlpine Retweeted Joan McAlpine
Joan McAlpine added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Schedule 3 s 26 & 27 set out legitimate aims & proportionality requirement for single *sex* services. GR protected characteristic does not change a person's sex - Where does the EqA say the exceptions based on sex require further justification if ppl for covered by section 7?
-
-
Good question.
#ButAnswerCameThereNone0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.