Maya Forstater

Justin refused to include a link to Kathleen’s essay in his regular “heap of links”. He said he’s not an expert but dismissed her article as containing ‘questionable moves’ and passages that were “gratuitously obnoxious”. http://dailynous.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/stock-kathleen-reply-2019-4-22.pdf …

And here is a thread by @mary_leng which picks up on one particularly egregious “questionable move” by Justinhttps://twitter.com/mary_leng/status/1120601337262219264 …

Of course “no one’s entitled to a link”. Justin says as a ’cis het man’ he doesn’t have much skin in the game & he didn't want to take the time to moderate a heated discussion on the site (he has posted several links critical of Kathleen previously though)

This might just be one poor judgement, but this story of people who put themselves on the line by writing careful analysis on this topic are shunned as too offensive for even the mildest endorsement is repeated in every sector of thinking.

@cgdev said no (and I lost my job for wanting to talk about this topic). The @ICRW said its “not the right fit for us”. I tried it with the @LSEengenderings. They said no. I sent the link to Ranil Dissanayake for his Friday round-up, but he didn’t run it and so on….

Or take another sector: human rights @Rights_info ran a series of articles last year about debates on the GRA but excluded any analysis by gender critical legal experts @adamwagner1 Amnesty says there is nothing to say on women's rights in relation to gender identity laws