I do none of these things. My only argument is that, since they are not biological females, they do not need rights that are based on women being females, and oppressed on basis of sex (CEDAW). It is really simple.
-
I am not trying to ridicule, I am trying to understand. You say there are some *womens* rights that should be extended to male people on the basis of performing gendered roles (and presumably denied to female people who don't). I am
and asking which roles you are thinking of?
NB: in the UK people are already protected against sex discrimination & harassment on the basis of perception. If someone is mistaken for a woman they are already covered. So Q is what other rights should be linked to "gender roles"?
