You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
For which i was told I was wrong and my motives were questionable by the leading lights of the tax justice movement 
https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2015/07/13/tax-justice-is-not-about-big-numbers/ …
... And my point is not to be personally aggrieved. The article ends with the usual call for more data. Great. But data is no use without institutions, networks and organisational cultures that allow people to look at it, learn from it and question.
and the OECD had clearly said 60%. Also, your anti-NGO crowd is too hung up on data/numbers, focusing on measurables and airbrushing out unmeasurables - with generic effect of skewing policy in favour of MNEs (see chapter in my Finance Curse book - can send it if u like.)
Nick. I know that John Neighbour when he was at @OECDtax once said 60% in an article in the OECD Observer magazine, and it was perhaps an honest mistake by many to read this as 'the OECD says' http://oecdobserver.org/news/archivestory.php/aid/670/Transfer_pricing:_Keeping_it_at_arms_length.html …
And we also need to develop a culture of being able to discuss numbers, provenance, methodologies, and all the rest without any concerns that this will be overlaid or contingent on motives/drivers ascribed to individuals.
and the other question is, your misquoting my article (not toooo egregiously, but still) seems to fit a pattern of your always, but always, trying to lowball the estimates. Which raises another question: why?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
