Maya Forstater

You say that the root of the problem is that I (and others) keep thinking abt trans women as inherently 'male'. Well yes. By definition to be a transwoman you have to be male.

You say we must assume that this sub- population of males do not have "male characteristics" eg in relation to sport and risk to women, but you have not offered any data for this. (its a big claim. It requires evidence)

Meanwhile you are saying that women in prison, refuges and shelters who have PTSD and who fear the presence of someone they recognise as male in women only spaces are a problem.

You are putting words in my mouth that are really not there. In the meantime, I have trouble following your arguments bc you keep shifting the goalposts. I don't think we can have more of a conversation than this

Bc we assume fundamentally different premises. You make the case that treating trans women as women is a problem, you mention specific instances, but seems to me that is much more generic. It's also weird to me that neither of these involve discussion of reproduction.

Which is the field in which I think most of the discussion is to be had. Also, it's weird to mix together to widely different fields like prison and sports, that have completely different implications for society and on the lives of ppl.

I think when you claim some ppl pose a problem and a risk to others in society YOU are the one with onus to prove it, not the other way around. And I just am not convinced by the 'evidence' you bring, which is very much related on assumptions and theory rather than facts

But, as I said, we have to agree do disagree. I don't appreciate ppl putting words in my mouth that were never there and Twitter does not allow the level of needed sophistication for a longer discussion. Or at least, I'm bad at it.