Maya Forstater

We should apply the precautionary principle (and ask why?) before getting rid of sex segregation and changing to"gender identity" segregation in these situations. 5/

(NB: it does not make sense to talk about "original biology" when the issue is 'gender identity' - - this does not imply or require body modifications although some chose to. No body literally "changes sex") 6

The risks on men and women from putting people in mixed sex situations are not symmetrical. About 98% of reported sexual assaults are committed by men. ( 7/)

If male prisoners are put into women's prisons the risk to women demonstrably (and predictably) rises. A male's preference is being traded of against women's safety. 9/

Yes, transwomen are vulnerable to (male) violence in men's prisons. So are other vulnerable males - eg effeminate young men, men w learning difficulties, sex offenders 10/

Prison authorities have a responsibility to protect all these vulnerable people. It is not obvious thar women must be used as human shields for males w gender dysphoria 11/

Many, many women in prison have life histories of being the victims of violence, sexual abuse and coercion by men. Forcing those vulnerable women to share with males undermines *their* mental wellbeing. 12/

In sports, as you say "the science is out" on the effects of hormone therapy. In other words there is no evidence that simply lowering testosterone for a short time erases all the other advantages of having a male body. 13/