no I'm not, I have expressed no view (here) about the merits of option A or B
-
Right and some of these are contexts where sex may be more sensible referent than self-identified gender.
I just mean it's "your Option" as in you are putting it on the table, so I'd like you to define it. Is it a thing (in which case what kind of thing) or is it a language game, for the purpose of an assumed greater good?
The question is does option B put together two sets of people "some women" + "some not women" and call the new category "women" (why? for what end?)...In all these contexts it is sex which matters. But Option B says there is no such thing as sex only gender identity. "[biological sex binary] bears no relation to modern scientific understandings of the expression of sexual differentiation/ patterns of gendered oppression"
-
-
Right. And I don't necessarily agree with that. But I was asking how much feminist social/economic analysis/struggle against patriarchy really suffers under B. Which I took to be your argument with TJN
-
But now my commute is over and it's bye bye twitter hello parenting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.