if you delink gender from biology, people who self-identify as women are overwhelmingly the same people as those who are biologically female. This just amounts to observing that only a small percentage of the population is trans.
Beyond social niceties (use whatever name people want etc..) in general we/ institutions should treat men and women the same - not discriminate based in sex. In most contexts don't treat men & women, boys & girls differently...
-
-
... There are a few situations where the law (in UK) allows orgs to treat men & women differently eg for privacy and dignity in situations of bodily contact/vulnerability with strangers, in sports, in healthcare, in communal accomadation, prisons, women's refuges, rape crisis etc
-
Right and some of these are contexts where sex may be more sensible referent than self-identified gender.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I kinda feel that "social niceties" might not do justice to the ways society can make your life tremendously miserable if you're a trans woman but hell I'm way out of my know whereof I speak zone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
I just mean it's "your Option" as in you are putting it on the table, so I'd like you to define it. Is it a thing (in which case what kind of thing) or is it a language game, for the purpose of an assumed greater good?
The question is does option B put together two sets of people "some women" + "some not women" and call the new category "women" (why? for what end?)...