What do you mean by "gender" here Paddy? Is it the objective fact of being recognisably female to self & others (i.e. The same as sex), is it the choice to present in a way that is associated with feminine stereotypes? Is it innate "gender identity" (womanly personality)?
-
-
TJN statement says " We unreservedly reject any linking of gender to a “biological” sex binary", but you think there's a 99% overlap... It can't be both surely?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MForstater @TaxJusticeNet
if you delink gender from biology, people who self-identify as women are overwhelmingly the same people as those who are biologically female. This just amounts to observing that only a small percentage of the population is trans.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CarterPaddy @TaxJusticeNet
If you delink 'gender' from biology what is it you think people are self identifying as? Is it something in your head/personality ('I think like a woman') or is it just a polite word for sex?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Can you define it? You are asking to replace a perfectly good definable, objectively, observable thing - sex - with something subjective and undefined.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @TaxJusticeNet
no I'm not, I have expressed no view (here) about the merits of option A or B
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CarterPaddy @TaxJusticeNet
I know Paddy
I just mean it's "your Option" as in you are putting it on the table, so I'd like you to define it. Is it a thing (in which case what kind of thing) or is it a language game, for the purpose of an assumed greater good?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @TaxJusticeNet
I don't claim to know, I just meant to refer to whatever it is that the authors of that TJN statement have in mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CarterPaddy @TaxJusticeNet
Well if the proposal for Option B is not coherent enough for us two to work out what it is maybe we are giving it too much credit for being a coherent idea?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @TaxJusticeNet
well, suppose it's: anyone who self-identifies as a woman. With that definition in hand, is analysis of, or policy recommendations about, women in education, tax, substantially altered if a very small number of those women are what you'd call males?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But again, what is it they are identifying as? If woman does not mean person with a female body? What is it?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.