Genuine question: is it better to write:
A sweeping critique, catalysing online response (by irked critics & enthusiasts alike), tho not necessarily shifting anyone's priors;
or
A more accurate, nuanced post, which engages constructively?
today's @fp2p https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/what-did-i-learn-from-wednesdays-arguments-over-aid-academia-and-the-literature/ …
-
New conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
