the pernicious idea that trans women are not "real women" is thought to contribute both to this pattern and other aspects of transmisogyny: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmisogyny …
I did not mean to. Quite the opposite. I know you study stuff. You use definitions all the time. You use data which is based on our commonly held held definitions and categories. I am perplexed at your saying definitions are impossible and don't matter.
-
-
I am fuming. Not at you. But at society telling women & girls that we must say this person is a woman. That they literally *are* a woman and that's all there is to it. That we are being mean and non inclusive to insist on what we know.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6227957/Transgender-sex-offender-41-groomed-12-year-old-schoolgirl-jailed-11-years.html …
-
This will be recorded as a female crime. And next time we talk about this issue (which we will, because we do, and I totally appreciate you making the effort) we'll use this to try to understand the world ...

End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I believe our previous discussion illustrated that even biological foundations of gender require construction, even if only "at the margins". Identity-based gender requires no construction at the margins.
-
To the extent that there even *is* any margin here, this becomes construction along the psychological/experiential margin rather than the biological. e.g. part IV of this essay:http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/11/21/the-categories-were-made-for-man-not-man-for-the-categories/ …
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
nobody is saying definitions are impossible and don't matter
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.