Thanks for being brave and taking the plunge with an answer Matt! As you know I disagree!
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @aidthoughts
I'm sympathetic to concerns about safety in prisons, less so about panels. Trans people are such a tiny minority (c.0.5% of US pop.), I struggle to see how they might usurp women's voices/ participation in business/ society.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
I certainly would not twitter-shame a panel if it included four men and a trans-woman. That would seem nasty, punitive, and hurtful to her identity (and other trans people). Without much gain. I would of course prefer it if every panel had more than one woman.
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Maya, are you saying that trans women are not women? I’m a bit confused...
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Yes I think that male people are not women. I dont think being a woman/female is a matter of identity or womanly feelings. It is biology. People of either sex should not be constrained (or discriminated against) if they dont conform to traditional gender expectations
6 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @SarahEOV and
this is really disappointing. trans women are women. In fact trans women face much more discrimination than cis women do, and we should be elevating their voices. (PS "biology" is as complex as economics and there is no use trying to apply high school bio to the real world.)
3 replies 1 retweet 27 likes -
Replying to @economeager @SarahEOV and
Many groups of people face more discrimination than women as a broad group. Elevating their voices does not require that we call all of those people 'women'. Smashing stereotypes is great. Erasing the category of female people is not.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @SarahEOV and
trans women are particularly vulnerable women, and since the push to include women on panels is about supporting the voices of women as a group, and trans women's voices actually need particular support, we should be specifically championing their inclusion.
4 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @economeager @MForstater and
+1. Also, this quest for a definition of female is unhelpful. Any attempt to impose a neat, mutually exclusive definition or typology is doomed to failure. The real world is a messy spread: clusters of characteristics. Definitions are inadequate & thus pointless, in all things.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @_alice_evans @MForstater and
I agree with this too! Anyone who identifies as a woman should be counted as one, and people should feel free to come in and out of the identity as they feel appropriate for themselves. Breaking down gender barriers will likely lead to greater gender equality across the spectrum.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
Yes people should of course be able to define their identity any way they like. But other people are not compelled to accept it as relating to any material reality. It is not possible to identify into the sex: woman. But you can identity your gender as woman (or whatever)....
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.