Yes I think that male people are not women. I dont think being a woman/female is a matter of identity or womanly feelings. It is biology. People of either sex should not be constrained (or discriminated against) if they dont conform to traditional gender expectations
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @SarahEOV and
this is really disappointing. trans women are women. In fact trans women face much more discrimination than cis women do, and we should be elevating their voices. (PS "biology" is as complex as economics and there is no use trying to apply high school bio to the real world.)
3 replies 1 retweet 27 likes -
Replying to @economeager @SarahEOV and
Many groups of people face more discrimination than women as a broad group. Elevating their voices does not require that we call all of those people 'women'. Smashing stereotypes is great. Erasing the category of female people is not.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @SarahEOV and
trans women are particularly vulnerable women, and since the push to include women on panels is about supporting the voices of women as a group, and trans women's voices actually need particular support, we should be specifically championing their inclusion.
4 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @economeager @MForstater and
+1. Also, this quest for a definition of female is unhelpful. Any attempt to impose a neat, mutually exclusive definition or typology is doomed to failure. The real world is a messy spread: clusters of characteristics. Definitions are inadequate & thus pointless, in all things.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @_alice_evans @economeager and
Josh Dean Retweeted ScienceVet
For those unfamiliar with this line of argument (that I wholeheartedly agree with), I like this thread as an introduction:https://twitter.com/ScienceVet2/status/1035246030500061184 …
Josh Dean added,
ScienceVet @ScienceVet2So. Hi new people! Apparently, we're gonna talk about sex. Like physical sex! Because... there's some confusion. First, sex defined: We're talking physical sex here, not gender. Body parts, hormones, and genetics (and more). BLUF: BIOLOGICAL sex is a spectrum 1/Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @mrkhtake2 @josh_t_dean and
we aren't saying that at all! we are saying that those intersex folks who are indeed male or female regardless of what is going on with chromosomes and hormones / sex characteristics are valid, and that this indeed shows the futility of using chromosomes etc as category markers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @mrkhtake2 @josh_t_dean and
there are a lot of people on both sides claiming to have the science on their side here, my understanding is that these determinations of gender made by doctors are very much subjective judgements - or is there a fully standardised protocol for this that they adhere to?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Doctors don't determine gender though, they observe sex (i think its going to help us not get confused if we don't conflate the two). Sometimes it's not immediately obvious and they have to investigate but it's not arbitrary/subjective
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.