No really this is nonsense on stilts! Males and female populations overlap on lots of axes (shoe size for example). But shoe size is not how we identify the sexes.https://twitter.com/josh_t_dean/status/1045684301885575169 …
Show this thread
-
Human beings (as with other primates and others) are massively bimodal on "number of penises"
pic.twitter.com/O7p1WDuKx8
Show this thread
Yes there are some people with intersex conditions where some sexual characteristics overlap. But nothing like Mr Science vet's pink and blue hillocks. There are different conditions and people with them are still M or F (Thanks to @mrkhtake2 for education)pic.twitter.com/6n0ExZanQR
-
-
The axes are supposed to represent an index of typically "female" sex traits (well the first one; the second is just an illustration of a histogram). Point is that "number of penises" is an arbitrary choice among a multitude of biological factors that cluster together.
-
No it is really not arbitrary at all. Every person that ever lived developed from two gametes. One large, one small. The large one came from a person without a penis. A person with no penis gestate and gave birth . The small gamete came from a person with a penis.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.