Thanks for being brave and taking the plunge with an answer Matt! As you know I disagree!
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @aidthoughts
I'm sympathetic to concerns about safety in prisons, less so about panels. Trans people are such a tiny minority (c.0.5% of US pop.), I struggle to see how they might usurp women's voices/ participation in business/ society.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
I certainly would not twitter-shame a panel if it included four men and a trans-woman. That would seem nasty, punitive, and hurtful to her identity (and other trans people). Without much gain. I would of course prefer it if every panel had more than one woman.
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Maya, are you saying that trans women are not women? I’m a bit confused...
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Yes I think that male people are not women. I dont think being a woman/female is a matter of identity or womanly feelings. It is biology. People of either sex should not be constrained (or discriminated against) if they dont conform to traditional gender expectations
6 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @SarahEOV and
this is really disappointing. trans women are women. In fact trans women face much more discrimination than cis women do, and we should be elevating their voices. (PS "biology" is as complex as economics and there is no use trying to apply high school bio to the real world.)
3 replies 1 retweet 27 likes -
Replying to @economeager @SarahEOV and
Many groups of people face more discrimination than women as a broad group. Elevating their voices does not require that we call all of those people 'women'. Smashing stereotypes is great. Erasing the category of female people is not.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @SarahEOV and
trans women are particularly vulnerable women, and since the push to include women on panels is about supporting the voices of women as a group, and trans women's voices actually need particular support, we should be specifically championing their inclusion.
4 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @economeager @SarahEOV and
Hi Rachael - obviously there are much broader societal questions in play than the
#manels scenario (I asked it as a practical example to see what people think is definition of women, & whether commitments made specifically to women as a group include men who identify as trans)..2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @economeager and
.. I think you are conflating two different things 1)transwomen are vulnerable people & therefore should be protected, championed etc.. Yes I agree. 2)Transwomen are women. No this is not true. Its not GCSE biology. People w male bodies who say they are women do not become women
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
You don't need to believe 2) to support 1). Believing 1) does not give any reason to believe 2) In fact I wonder if most people who say they believe number 2 really believe it. It certainly doesn't seem to be the kind of belief we form based on evidence
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.