I read it last night. Sadly, it's just more trans-exclusionary feminism, which is what I feared. Those transphobic arguments are well known. We fundamentally disagree on definition of sexism and what justice means. I've stated the problem several times now, so will leave it here.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I wish you could answer that to me?
Since, literally, *no one* is advocating that being female involves having a 'perfect vagina' (what ever that means) this seems like like a dead end to take the discussion Carolina. How about we talk about actual points of agreement, disagreement or confusion?
-
-
The bad choice of the adj 'perfect' was to try & highlight the definition of female people as of the two classes of human - sexual dimorphism. But it shouldn't distract us from other more interesting arguments we're having. Yes! Let's try & sum up: agree/disagreements & confusion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.