(obviously manels thing is small, but it is interesting to think thru). i.e. yes the typical manel we are reacting against is four old, posh, white men. Sex diversity is not the only thing we care about. But a panel of men of different ages, races & backgrounds is still a manel
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @ingridharvold and
In my opinion the manel issue is about under-represented genders & I find your fight to make it about only people of female gender and born with female sex displaced. It seems to come at the back of a gender that in many setting is even more discriminated against than cis-women.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DinaPomeranz @MForstater and
It's not just in an abstract sense interesting, but can be very hurtful to a small group of people who often feel that they are not accepted anywhere. That's it. I'm out. I said my piece.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @DinaPomeranz @MForstater and
Oppression based on sex & gender are both consequences of patriarchy so I would be wary of pitting the two against each other (as also mentioned by
@DinaPomeranz). As discrimination against trans people is particularly bad, focusing on gender is more inclusive.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ingridharvold @DinaPomeranz and
I do think it's important to include trans in our fight for rights & representation if we want an inclusive movement (as mentioned by
@_alice_evans). But in practice trans make up small %, so fighting along gender lines is largely compatible with fighting for sex-diversity.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ingridharvold @DinaPomeranz and
We can include all kinds of factors of discrimination sex, sexuality, disability, mental health, trans (and all ppl) in fight for rights & representation. There is no need to collapse any two categories together. Gender identity & sex are completely unrelated. why conflate them?
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @DinaPomeranz and
I don't think they are "completely unrelated." If we put all people who are not cis-men into one group you will inevitably get majority cis-women. What is it you are worried about if we prioritize diversity of gender over diversity of sex?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ingridharvold @DinaPomeranz and
There is a broad issue about whether we define women as female people, or as 'anyone who identifies as a woman'.Gender ID & sex are different things, so we shouldnt conflate them. Lots of women don't identify as 'cis-women' as it implies embracing gendered expectations of females
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @ingridharvold and
I am concerned protections/programmes for women/girls undermined if we substitute 'gender' for 'sex'- a benefit to GNC males does not fulfil a commitment to women. Say u were starting programme to support a different group eg disabled people, u wouldn't cut commitments to women
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @DinaPomeranz and
I was arguing that it's better to prioritize gender diversity when it comes to panels, in response to your original post. I still wonder why you're worried abt this. Re. your new point about prioritization of different vulnerable group, I wouldn't take such a balkanized approach.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
My concern is not specifically panels, but more generally the shift from thinking about sexism - women discriminated against cos of physical sex & gendered expectations society places-to thinking men & women 'different in the brain' wired to stereotypically gendered behaviour
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @DinaPomeranz and
It's still not clear to me what your worry is, exactly. We may have to agree to disagree, as you define sexism very narrowly. Structures of patriarchy favor cis-men, so focusing on only one sex/gender excludes others who experience discrimination due to those same structures.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ingridharvold @DinaPomeranz and
Hi Ingrid - probably too much for a tweet now!
@janeclarejones explains really wellhttps://janeclarejones.com/2018/09/09/appendix/ …1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - 13 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.