Yes i think there are limited situations where we allow a facility or programme to be selective about sex (in most situations someone's sex does not matter & whether you are male or female shld not be taken into account in your suitability for employment, entry, membership etc..)
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @aidthoughts and
It sounds like you had some bad experiences related to trans women. I imagine they were not about too many trans people appearing on public panels. What's your underlying experience that leads to you feeling so strongly about this issue?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DinaPomeranz @MForstater and
Fighting oppression of women is about fighting structures of patriarchy. To me this means securing the space & rights of all people who don't have the privileges that come w/being cis-male. So to Maya's original Q, only panels made up of primarily cis-males should be challenged.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ingridharvold @DinaPomeranz and
Well, only panels made up of primarily cis-males should be challenged for lacking diverse perspectives based on gender (to me that's what manel means). That's not to say that we shouldn't challenge panels & other platforms for lacking diversity in other ways-e.g. race, geography.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @ingridharvold @DinaPomeranz and
What about diversity of sex? Sex and gender are different things (and are not related) why are we treating them interchangably, whereas we don't treat diversity of race, geography, age etc... as interchangeable with diversity of sex?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @ingridharvold and
(obviously manels thing is small, but it is interesting to think thru). i.e. yes the typical manel we are reacting against is four old, posh, white men. Sex diversity is not the only thing we care about. But a panel of men of different ages, races & backgrounds is still a manel
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @ingridharvold and
In my opinion the manel issue is about under-represented genders & I find your fight to make it about only people of female gender and born with female sex displaced. It seems to come at the back of a gender that in many setting is even more discriminated against than cis-women.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DinaPomeranz @MForstater and
It's not just in an abstract sense interesting, but can be very hurtful to a small group of people who often feel that they are not accepted anywhere. That's it. I'm out. I said my piece.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @DinaPomeranz @MForstater and
Oppression based on sex & gender are both consequences of patriarchy so I would be wary of pitting the two against each other (as also mentioned by
@DinaPomeranz). As discrimination against trans people is particularly bad, focusing on gender is more inclusive.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ingridharvold @DinaPomeranz and
I do think it's important to include trans in our fight for rights & representation if we want an inclusive movement (as mentioned by
@_alice_evans). But in practice trans make up small %, so fighting along gender lines is largely compatible with fighting for sex-diversity.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
We can include all kinds of factors of discrimination sex, sexuality, disability, mental health, trans (and all ppl) in fight for rights & representation. There is no need to collapse any two categories together. Gender identity & sex are completely unrelated. why conflate them?
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @DinaPomeranz and
I don't think they are "completely unrelated." If we put all people who are not cis-men into one group you will inevitably get majority cis-women. What is it you are worried about if we prioritize diversity of gender over diversity of sex?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ingridharvold @DinaPomeranz and
There is a broad issue about whether we define women as female people, or as 'anyone who identifies as a woman'.Gender ID & sex are different things, so we shouldnt conflate them. Lots of women don't identify as 'cis-women' as it implies embracing gendered expectations of females
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes - 18 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.