You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
As someone who’s recently taken the pledge I wanted to add my thoughts. If someone sees themselves as a woman (or nonbinary) I’ll take that on face value. I’m not sure if it’s helpful to rehash all the arguments on this debate here but wanted to let you know my approach
Thanks Robert. Of course it is polite to respect people's identity at face value. But I think there is a Q on what ppl think the pledge (& by extension other places formally/informally reserved for women) are for though....
I think it is to say "As a man I will use my influence to encourage organisers to bring a woman in, if necessary by giving up my place". If there is a male NB person on the panel (eg Edward Lord https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/07/30/gender-equality-campaigner-defends-freemason-membership/ …) I don't think this satisfies the condition of having a woman
I think it's about fighting against lazy programming that leads to all-male panels and overlooks qualified panelists who aren't men. My gut says that someone who is non-binary doesn't fit into either "male" or "female" and so wouldn't make it a manel.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
