@discoverRB @RakeshKapoor_ why is Durex supporting this sexist, scary, inaccurate and inappropriate material for school sex education? @bishtraining https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1037841671025831936 …pic.twitter.com/bZIAamwa0V
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Why would it be OK to cover a real serious issue that effects women and girls, including some that are in UK classrooms as just a single sentence, to offer a contrast to something else?
For context there are *25 pages on porn* - - variations all spelt out in detail. But one throwaway sentence on FGM which doesn't even bother to spell out what F. G. M. stands for
In a lesson which had a different focus, I would say yes. If I'm teaching reproduction, I don't spend equal class time on intercourse and assault.
I'm not critiquing your lesson plan. I'm talking about this resource. Its coverage of FGM is inadequate and inaccurate. It does not even say what the letters stand for.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.