[Thread] A few ppl have asked me @PennyMordaunt tweet "Money lost from Africa in illicit flows & corruption is estimated to be more than the world’s combined aid spending & lending for that continent. Just think what that money could do!" Is it true?https://twitter.com/PennyMordaunt/status/1035784059258109952 …
-
Show this thread
-
It is not *not* true. But
the estimates are sketchy & comparison with aid is not meaningful. On the other
crime & corruption are real & big: it is certainly right for the UK to act to prevent IFFs & return assets. Does it matter that these
s don't mean much? (2/)1 reply 1 retweet 1 likeShow this thread -
The estimates are probably either the trade misinvoicing estimates by e.g.
@GFI_Tweets &@IFF_Africa, or the more general international guesstimate that corruption costs 5% of GDP, or money laundering is 2-5% of GDP (3/)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
These are in the same ballpark as aid & loans to govt 'for that continent'. But (1) the estimates are not at all reliable https://www.cgdev.org/blog/illicit-financial-flows-and-trade-misinvoicing-time-reassess …https://globalanticorruptionblog.com/2016/01/05/its-time-to-abandon-the-2-6-trillion5-of-global-gdp-corruption-cost-estimate/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
(2) continent-wide comparisons not all that meaningful -- most of the big estimates relate to a few countries (3) IFFs are not all like 'aid in reverse' --offshored private assets &laundering criminal profits are different in terms of public finances to theft of public assets
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
In short: this is not a massive misunderstanding of the estimates that exist, but its not all that meaningful either. It is an arresting factoid from a communications perspective but it risks creating unrealistic expectationshttps://globalanticorruptionblog.com/2016/01/20/waging-at-corruption-a-modest-proposal/ …
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likesShow this thread -
'Just think of what the money could do!' isn't the right way to think about returned IFFs IMO: the legal processes takes too long & the sums returned are too small for this to be major source of investment finance. Attack IFFs to disrupt crime & corruption and prevent impunity.
4 replies 1 retweet 1 likeShow this thread -
Replying to @MForstater
Thanks for this great & v useful thread. Isn't the prize in looking forward to reduce future IFFs, rather than trying to reclaim past IFFs?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AlexJacobs16
Yes. But even then it is not straightforward to think of these as gross amounts of 'lost' resources that if they didn't flow out wld be invested domestically. e.g. if you disrupt ML by a drug trafficking network, putting them out of business would not unleash a flow of funds...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MForstater @AlexJacobs16
..or to look at a different bit of IFFs, tax information exchange & enforcement can uncover illicit (unreported) offshore wealth & collect tax on it. But the gross amount wont necessarily come back for investment. This is what happened in Indonesia re: accounts in Singapore.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Coming up w a bit number and saying 'Just think of what the money could do!' suggests big, simple impacts. In practice it is harder and the impacts less direct. But I can see it fits the expectations ppl have come to expect for intl dev interventions! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEb_epsuLqA …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.