Yes. There is a case for strengthening the work of the UN Tax Committee, but confusing illicit flows with tax evasion with base erosion and profit shifting is not it!https://twitter.com/DanNeidle/status/1034778480137986049 …
-
But it would be semantics, Maya, as a food regulator would need to deal with all of these!
Yes, and customs and tax authorities also deal with all of these issues. But not by muddling them together. I won't try to go too much further with the chicken analogy!
-
-
The billions that Abdul quotes do not represent 'tax evasion', let alone BEPs. Perhaps it is semantics (as in expecting words and numbers to be meaningful rather than used interchangeably to muddle up different phenomena) -- the differences matterhttps://www.cgdev.org/blog/pinning-down-illicit-financial-flows-why-definitions-matter …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I take your point. Just couldn’t resist responding!
-
On the other hand, BEPS is about as relevant to smuggling as it is to chickens.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.