Yes. There is a case for strengthening the work of the UN Tax Committee, but confusing illicit flows with tax evasion with base erosion and profit shifting is not it!https://twitter.com/DanNeidle/status/1034778480137986049 …
-
Okay, tax avoidance/abuse/dodging/planning/manipulation/malpractice/whatever else pleases you. Frankly don't care too much over quibbling over semantics beyond a point. Thanks for the data update though, will check that out.
Not caring about distinctions between IFFs, evasion, avoidance & BEPS undermines your case for resources at UN. Its like arguing about which body should be responsible for food safety while viewing distinction between frozen, cooked and raw chicken as "quibbling over semantics"!
-
-
But it would be semantics, Maya, as a food regulator would need to deal with all of these!
-
Yes, and customs and tax authorities also deal with all of these issues. But not by muddling them together. I won't try to go too much further with the chicken analogy!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.