Its always nice to get a name-check in Ranil's Friday round-up https://blogs.csae.ox.ac.uk/2018/07/links-round-up-103/ … (and for those who don't you should subscribe!) https://www.cgdev.org/blog/proposed-sdg-indicator-illicit-financial-flows-risks-conflating-ordinary-business-dirty-money … He picks up something which I've been thinking about but haven't written on yet....
If simple ratios like 'misalignment' between location of profits & employee headcount/payroll/sales don't make a lot of sense at the level of individual companies, what do the patterns which emerge when we look at aggregate data [e.g. Torslov/Wier/Zucman's paper] mean for #BEPS?
-
-
In my blog post i only look at 4 companies (so shouldn't read too much into it, but gives a clue). Some countries show up on both the 'positive' and 'negative' misalignment sides. e.g. UK, US, France and South Africa all appear on different sides for different companies
Show this thread -
In an aggregation this kind of thing would tend to cancel out, & only countries that appear on one side predominantly will show up (like Lux) -- this means the ratio isn't picking up 'profit shifting' exactly, but places w more mobile activities & management of intangiables
Show this thread -
i.e. the ratio doesn't pick up whether the mobile activities/intangibles are correctly priced and legally compliant, just that they are concentrated there. So then you end up back at the
#taxmantra discussionpic.twitter.com/Bme0S3e2wt
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.