Tweeting my post: https://www.cgdev.org/blog/proposed-sdg-indicator-illicit-financial-flows-risks-conflating-ordinary-business-dirty-money … Illicit financial flows are dirty money crossing borders. Why is @UNCTAD suggesting we measure this by looking at legally compliant corporate tax practices?
-
Show this thread
-
Before the SDG target was set,
#IFFs were described as comprising " tax evasion, the theft of state assets, the laundering of the proceeds of crime, and a range of market and regulatory abuses under cover of anonymity", but now the focus has shifted to tax avoidance#BEPS by MNCs2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
The proposal for assessing progress on this is based on “misalignment”looking at aggregated data from CBCR reports and seeing where MNC profits don't match up with employee headcount and sales.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
But this captures ordinary tax compliance as well as tax avoidance (since tax rules do not seek alignment between profits and the average of headcount and sales, and international businesses are not homogenous globally)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Before setting the indicator we should try it out with real data to see how much of a problem this is. I tested the metric out on three companies: Person, Vodafone, Barclays and Lush.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
<spoiler alert> The calculation suggests ordinary business hides huge "illicit financial flows". The worst offender based on the metric was Fair Tax Marked Lush! (I don't think Lush is doing anything untoward but this is what the calculation spits out)pic.twitter.com/cFHa6RWvqf
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Overall the big numbers (billions from just two companies!) are driven by large companies. I really don't think this indicator measures illicitness at all.pic.twitter.com/oqEuZv70sE
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
This indicator is being developed through expert consultations that are getting narrower, not wider. The last meeting managed to include multiple different representatives from Tax Justice Network orgs, but not a single tax practitioner http://unctad.org/en/Pages/MeetingDetails.aspx?meetingid=1864 …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.