Many people have been tweeting about this blog (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/jul/16/buzzwords-crazes-broken-aid-system-poverty?CMP=twt_gu …, on whether we should shift our attention from aid project evaluations to structural causes of underdevelopment. I'm curious to know, have these discussions changed your views & priorities?
-
-
Replying to @_alice_evans
I don't think the issue is so much about project evaluations or (And!) structural causes, but that they lay into a strawman of evidence based approaches on the first, but don't offer evidence for their treatment of the bundle of issues on the second. Danger of buzzwords for both!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
Well, it is a short newspaper article, so full references are a tall ask. Giving them the benefit of the doubt, we can interpret it as raising bigger questions, namely about (1) what kind of evidence we use; and (2) the questions we ask. My poll concerned the second.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_alice_evans
Of course not full refs. But they dont make any case eg that public ed. = only soln. '*we*need to introduce & enforce real labour legislation' (what does that mean?!) No sign they've looked at scale of MNC tax, and they suggest misinvoicing is behaviour of large biz.... So....
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Your questions 1 and 2 are good but we should notice that (1) they don't offer evidence and (2) they don't raise questions, just give us some "trust us, we're Nobel Laureates" answers
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.