Since I criticized the poor handling of a sexual harassment case at the World Bank, responses to me have been 75% about whether I was right to call it an institutional decision (yes, I was)… not about how to prevent further such grave injustices to women at the Bank.
(1) the tribunal still found misconduct and (2)if there had been more evidence (like actual successful upskirt pics) on his phone or computer they would have reached a different conclusion. I think we can say we disagree w their judgement w out jumping
-
-
... to this conclusion!
-
In any judicial/quasi-judicial process it can be tempting - but poss dangerous - to reach conclusions on specific cases without studying all the evidence, listened to witness, hearing the cross examination. That's not the same as discussing the culture/HR policies/protection.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.