Kudos to the brilliant @m_clem & many others, condemning Gilead's/ World Bank's decision to overlook sexual harassment.
But as I've always said, naming and shaming is not enough. We need independent external review of all organisations, to hold them accountable & curb abuse. https://twitter.com/BerkOzler12/status/1018019214286868480 …
Thanks Alice - I didn't mean that u, or anyone was misleading, but I do think it's worth us understanding what the bank did, vs decision by the tribunal (and what that is). Even tho outcome here seems unsatisfactory the case is different from ones of complaints being hushed up
-
-
Isnt that what the Tribunal is in this case ? I don't know what a 'public body reviewing all these decisions' would be?(all employment decisions where there is a sexual harassment aspect? Globally?) What would '0 tolerance' mean if there are disputed accounts?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.