You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Kudos to the brilliant @m_clem & many others, condemning Gilead's/ World Bank's decision to overlook sexual harassment.
But as I've always said, naming and shaming is not enough. We need independent external review of all organisations, to hold them accountable & curb abuse. https://twitter.com/BerkOzler12/status/1018019214286868480 …
In this case it seems like it was the independent external review which made this ' call! The World Bank's response *was* to fired him, and they defended that decision to the tribunal. The tribunal ruled they should reinstate.pic.twitter.com/W9orcpK9o6
This may seem semantics but if the IMF appoints the Tribunal members then it's actually an internal body, albeit staffed by judicial people. So not clear how their decision would align with that of a Court, either civil or criminal.
Sort of - the WB Executive Directors (i.e. govt representatives of member countries) appoint the people who sit on the panel. Tweeps are jumping to the conclusion that WB HR swept this under the carpet, when if fact it looks like the opposite - they fired the guy.
Thank you for this clarification. The Tribunal is part of the governance structure of the Bank. If the owners of Nestlé had consultants oblige the CFO to take some action, it would not be wrong to say that “Nestlé” did this.
Sure but consultants are not the same thing as a panel of independents appointed on fixed terms. Presumably there is little the Bank's owners (aka the govts) or the Directors can do to influence the tribunal judges (and that's how we would want it)
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
