Maya Forstater

I have no knowledge of Pearson’s tax affairs but that cannot be right.

(* note -- its close but not quite what the proposed indicator would measure - indicator uses outward sales while Pearson report revenues including intracompany transactions ....but its close enough to get an idea of what the indicator captures in practice here)

Large if we take 'group adjustments' as indicative - towards 1/4 of all revenue. But it's the fact the group made such a heavy loss that's driving the pattern of results and makes them unrepresentative.

I believe that Pearson is covered in the great British tax robbery by Richard brooks

Amusing to see critics of pcbcr trying to use pcbcr to evidence their point.

I saw it as using PBCBR to check FA utility. If it produces anomalies then what ever else the arguments for/against PBCBR might be, not so easy for it to be reliably plugged into FA?