Alex, the point you make here isn’t right. You are taking a definition of real economic activity which is alien to the current tax system and asserting that departures from it are tax avoidance.pic.twitter.com/Tpxbo2PbuN
-
But the large numbers that are thrown around are often used to suggest exactly this: that all misalignment is intentional profit shifting. That ain’t so.
And then to define "misalignment" as "avoidance" and an "illicit financial flow" ..... The arguments against this are not just that the "definitions used are sometimes unclear or contradictory" (as I am summarised!) but that they are not the same thing.
-
-
Once again, that's the opposite of what the text says. I don't want to be impatient, but this game is more fun when people disagree with things that we are actually saying. Also,
. -
Ditto. In the paper you are not limited by 280 chrs, but you only give 7 words (and some ad homs) to helping your readers understand the case against. "the definitions used are sometimes unclear and contradictory" is not it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.