New paper from @gabriel_zucman cited by @Ed_Miliband showing that the idea that companies are mobile is wrong. They shift profits, but it’s much harder to shift jobs/factories - so govts shouldn’t be so focused on cutting corporate tax rates. http://gabriel-zucman.eu/files/TWZ2018.pdf … @alexcobham
-
-
Replying to @robertnpalmer @gabriel_zucman and
@MForstater There are those@delaFeriaR who say that customers are even more immobile, whereas we have seen millions of jobs lost from G20 countries, to places where mobile capital has invested into new factories, sometimes with inducements to relocate there...2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @iaincampbell07 @gabriel_zucman and
You have a point, but as
@alexcobham reframed the issue - Tax rates are often a 2nd, 3rd etc order issue for companies compared to day labour costs or market access1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @robertnpalmer @gabriel_zucman and
I'm not so sure of that. If factories/jobs are so hard to move then how is it so many jobs have gone, not just accounting profits? And would we then not be trying to raise minimum wages in such countries as much, if not more, than reducing avoidance?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @iaincampbell07 @gabriel_zucman and
I think it's more that the argument that companies move jobs/factories primarily on the basis of the tax rate doesn't stack up. They might profit shift for that reason. If they are going to move jobs, it's for other reasons e.g. cheaper labour.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
I don't think this follows from TWZ's research. They find that profits but not tangible capital move to lower tax states etc. But this does not mean that capital (& jobs) don't move between higher tax states. As Rita said tax effects marginal.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.