Here, Andrew Gelman points to an odd sociological feature of science publication: (a) sexy result is published; (b) with the benefit of hindsight original result is resoundingly refuted; (c) original result persists as canon.https://andrewgelman.com/2018/10/24/study-fails-replicate-continues-get-referenced-no-problems-communication-channels-blocked/ …
0 replies
4 retweets
13 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.