John Delaney talked more than a <1% should tonight, but he also got the benefit of being sandwiched between answers from Sanders and Warren because CNN knows drama. (That may or may not be another channel’s slogan.) https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5d40f13be4b01d8c97830db1?gg …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I didn’t get enough Williamson to make those three hours worth my time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The fact that a network is intentionally "casting" anyone as anything in a debate that's supposed to be a way to inform the public is ridiculous. I guess CNN learned nothing from 2016.
-
I'm sure they learned a lot but their goals are different than ours. They're fine fucking over the nation for better ratings.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Delaney is done. Doubt we see him again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Love how this captures Delaney's peevish smile after Warren blasted him for spouting Repub healthcare talking points: “I don’t know why anybody goes to all the trouble of running for president of the United States just to talk about what we really can’t do & shouldn’t fight for"
End of conversation
-
-
-
And everyone loved the contrast.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Absolutely true. Divisiveness is good television, even if it tears at the fabric of our democracy. The media ought to be a public good, not a hodgepodge of contrived drama and punditry.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Moscow plant
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.