Trader Joe's incident -https://nypost.com/2011/06/17/accuser-in-trader-joes-pad-thai-fight-lashes-out-at-verdict/ …
-
-
Reprimand for her attitude towards patients that didn't have the right politics -https://bangordailynews.com/2018/08/16/news/down-east/milbridge-doctor-running-against-collins-reprimanded-for-unprofessional-conduct/ …
1 reply . 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
Archive of an amazing response to Dr London's thread about male circumcision - http://archive.vn/00p77 (h/t to
@briandavidearp for a clean, polite and concise response to Dr. London's position.)1 reply . 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
Your lady-bits are patriarchy, & I wanna smash it Retweeted
Here's an example of Dr London retweeting someone that's comparing intactivists to anti-vaxxers - https://twitter.com/CleanCutForever/status/1081185899952648192 … That's not a good look for anyone, let alone a doctor. And as detailed in the archive immediately above, grossly inaccurate.
Your lady-bits are patriarchy, & I wanna smash it added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply . 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
The sum total of her advocacy in favour appears to revolve around it's importance in the Judaic tradition, which does not constitute "medical grounds" for supporting the procedure, as far as I'm aware.pic.twitter.com/Xvys9gwE4J
1 reply . 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
It's also part of Catholic and Islamic tradition, and those are ALSO not grounds for a gross invasion of any infant's bodily autonomy. If your religious tradition requires mutilating babies, perhaps you shouldn't take an oath to "do no harm", Dr. London?pic.twitter.com/k0wZQWouR3
1 reply . 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Your lady-bits are patriarchy, & I wanna smash it Retweeted SunTzuTech
Dr London retweeting people that compare intactivists to climate-change denialists - https://twitter.com/SunTzuTech/status/1081174625483177984 … Listen, we can and should study climate change. But there's no excuse to cut the genitals of infants. Not cleanliness, not phimosis. Neither requires it. No comparison.
Your lady-bits are patriarchy, & I wanna smash it added,
1 reply . 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Dr London citing claims that "circumcision does not reduce male penile sensitivity." I hate to be the bearer of bad news, Dr. London, but amputation or damage to ANY flesh with nerve-endings in it will call desensitization. I'm a high school dropout, and I know that.pic.twitter.com/6TdG4SdkpO
1 reply . 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
That ignores the keratinization of the glans, which would further degrade sensitivity, since calloused or scarred skin is inherently less sensitive than undamaged skin. Again, high school dropout, and I know that.
1 reply . 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
There's also evidence that circumcision causes psychological trauma - https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage … I don't see how it's medically ethical to inflict trauma on an infant that's incapable of consenting, especially without medical need.
1 reply . 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread
At any rate, you don't have to believe anything I've said, since I've linked the threadroll for David Brian Earp's thread. Feel free to take his word for it, over mine. He seems quite professionally capable of addressing the issue.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.