Your lady-bits are patriarchy, & I wanna smash it

@MEMESofVIOLENCE

Pro-bacon. Pro-evidence. Completely unrepentant and your feelers will never concern me, is mine.

Joined August 2015

Tweets

You blocked @MEMESofVIOLENCE

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @MEMESofVIOLENCE

  1. Pinned Tweet

    Retweet to secure an free timeline.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  2. PETA out there trying to break ratio records.

    Undo
  3. New from me at : What was really going on in that misreported University of Missouri story where officials supposedly said it's sexual misconduct to ask a shorter person out? Not quite PC gone wild, but an indication of real problems.

    Undo
  4. 17 hours ago
    Undo
  5. At any rate, you don't have to believe anything I've said, since I've linked the threadroll for David Brian Earp's thread. Feel free to take his word for it, over mine. He seems quite professionally capable of addressing the issue.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. There's also evidence that circumcision causes psychological trauma - I don't see how it's medically ethical to inflict trauma on an infant that's incapable of consenting, especially without medical need.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. That ignores the keratinization of the glans, which would further degrade sensitivity, since calloused or scarred skin is inherently less sensitive than undamaged skin. Again, high school dropout, and I know that.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Dr London citing claims that "circumcision does not reduce male penile sensitivity." I hate to be the bearer of bad news, Dr. London, but amputation or damage to ANY flesh with nerve-endings in it will call desensitization. I'm a high school dropout, and I know that.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. Dr London retweeting people that compare intactivists to climate-change denialists - Listen, we can and should study climate change. But there's no excuse to cut the genitals of infants. Not cleanliness, not phimosis. Neither requires it. No comparison.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. It's also part of Catholic and Islamic tradition, and those are ALSO not grounds for a gross invasion of any infant's bodily autonomy. If your religious tradition requires mutilating babies, perhaps you shouldn't take an oath to "do no harm", Dr. London?

    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. The sum total of her advocacy in favour appears to revolve around it's importance in the Judaic tradition, which does not constitute "medical grounds" for supporting the procedure, as far as I'm aware.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Here's an example of Dr London retweeting someone that's comparing intactivists to anti-vaxxers - That's not a good look for anyone, let alone a doctor. And as detailed in the archive immediately above, grossly inaccurate.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  13. Archive of an amazing response to Dr London's thread about male circumcision - (h/t to for a clean, polite and concise response to Dr. London's position.)

    Show this thread
    Undo
  14. Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Show this thread
    Undo
  16. Oh look, the doctor that - got into a court case over an argument in a NYC Trader Joe's, - was reprimanded for her treatment of her Trump supporting patients, - and thinks that circumcision for male infants is fine, regardless of the ethical implications, has blocked me. Oh no.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  17. Show this thread
    Undo
  18. Since is such a failure at posting doots, I guess I have to do it for her -

    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. "If women ran the world there'd be no wars..."

    Undo
  20. Dec 31
    Show this thread
    Undo
  21. Here we go again. They count Candy Crush players as gamers. My take on this kind of lazy, misleading analysis.

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·