Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @M0zrat

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @M0zrat

  1. 1. velj

    okay, nooow we're starting a little work on our collaborative game design project @ w/

    Poništi
  2. 31. sij

    p.s. This model might work for all organizations...?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 31. sij

    Answer these questions well, and I think you the foundation for a sustainable DAO. Try plugging in , , , or – interestingly different but valid designs (groups can overlap).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 31. sij

    2d. *Workers* - How does one go about doing work for the DAO? - And why would one do that work? 👇

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 31. sij

    2c. *Funders* (customers) - How are assets given to the DAO? - Why will people send the DAO assets? (Often some version of "B/c they want the DAO's purpose") 👇

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 31. sij

    2b. *Decision-makers* - How do decisions get made / actions get taken? - What reason do decision-makers have to make wise choices for the DAO's purpose? 👇

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 31. sij

    2a. *Potential decision-makers* - How does someone get decision power in the DAO? - And why would they do it? How are people motivated by the DAO's purpose particularly incentivized to get decision-power? 👇

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 31. sij

    1. Define the DAO's *purpose*: what are you trying to get done? 👇

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 31. sij

    Presented at NYC yesterday: a practical framework for DAO designs/business models. DAOs are a big topic, but I think they all need: 1. Purpose 2. Definitions for these (possible overlapping) groups: - Potential decision-makers - Decision-makers - Funders - Workers 👇

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 31. sij
    Poništi
  11. 31. sij
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 DAOfest_ delivered a great worskhop in NYC tonight based on the example of DAO with grandiose hand gestures by assisted by – mjesto: Crypto NYC

    Poništi
  13. 30. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 30. sij

    There are probably ways to address both problems (e.g. for individuals, give stake in projects they donate to, or let them fund things conditionally; for matchers, give them positive attention, etc.).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 30. sij

    Alternatively, if the matching total doesn't go up, why would would individual donators (non-matchers in Gitcoin's system) give more in the future than they did this round?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 30. sij

    Short thread about recent public goods funding efforts in

    Poništi
  17. 30. sij

    CLR is another form of wealth redistribution. Why should the richest players be interested long term when they can have 100% say over their funds instead? (as they do in foundation & )

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 30. sij

    Total matching was $200k. seems to think this needs to eventually grow by >20x. This could come from "capturing t[x] fees at layer 2," but why would big layer 2 players donate that much each year? 👇

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 30. sij

    In all the excitement about grants (), it seems like the issue of sufficient funding for public goods is still mostly being ignored. The top grant this round was ~$30k. 👇

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Join us tomorrow in for : From concept to launch ft 🇺🇸 We'll learn more about dOrg's legal DAO model, and design your own DAO during the exercise! Ft 🎉 Join the waiting list here 👇

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·