No, clearly /incel/ in the nominative singular used to be *incels, and the -s dropped out in historical development.
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Cf. /pax, pacis/.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I don’t think there is, unless we just call it s-apocope.pic.twitter.com/NeCoMjpAR4
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Except if your correpondent does not admit your gratuit assert that 'incel' belongs to the third declinson, and think of 'incelus, inceli'
-
That’s just wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
these DM conversations sound like a real barrel of laughs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.