Kathryn, @eiais, did not bypass code review.
She didn't disrupt anyone's work.
She didn't target an individual.
She didn't violate any policy I'm aware of.
She linked to an NLRB notice from an extension that exists to show links to policies.
This only makes sense as retaliation.https://twitter.com/eiais/status/1206937188409044993 …
-
-
bootlicker
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
As far as I have seen, the purpose of the extension was to show policies relevant to the website you're looking at, making changes to that extension was part of her job, and the policy she made the extension show is something Google is already required to inform employees about.
-
Which is why I read her thread, in which she admitted to having been a nuisance many times
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
thanks for demonstrating your inability to read
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
it's a good thing that employers can fire people for any reasonHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
love too leap to the defense of those who retaliate against protected concerted activity
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Lucio pls
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.