And now, like @Schneiderman, we will focus on taking Trump down.
And like @Comey, @Schneiderman will be there for that victory. Bet on it.
#TrumpRussiapic.twitter.com/veC6Sru7eG
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why did he resign then?
-
To protect the investigation from the news being all about him.
@comey is familiar. -
AG 's office has announced an investigation. Truth will out regardless of what it is.
-
You mean Cyrus Vance, the DA of Manhattan who took backhanders from Jared and Ivanka and whom
@AGSchneiderman is investigating for corruption? I say “is” because he will remain the Attorney General all day today. -
Hmm.....yeah. BTW, Louise, do you have any thoughts about Barbara Underwood, a possible temporary replacement for Eric Schneiderman? Another person I trust seems to trust her, but I just wanted to see if you had your own take on this or not.https://twitter.com/Delavegalaw/status/993707455652675584 …
-
The person you quote is distrusted by a person I trust :) but that’s not that relevant. I know nothing of her one way or the other.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
at least it smoked out a few more traitors
-
See my pinned. It’s actually something of a relief albeit at a terrible price, to know that the cases on Vance, others, can be referred today to FISC with good cause by
@AGSchneiderman @schneiderman, and that he has today to detail to Mueller multiple investigations
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't know much but based on the article, it is very suspicious. They were all involved with him consensually and then suddenly they decided to step forward "at the right time"? The timing is very strange. I may be wrong.
-
Exactly. I’ve no doubt @Schneiderman did spank women or whatever and no doubt either that it was consensual. It’s an entirely common fantasy scenario. But justice won’t be denied, for Trump or the others in this that he was investigating.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's clearly true if you read the article. It sucks, but neither party is free from it. The incriminating info on Trump is still there, this is one guy, deservedly gone.https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/four-women-accuse-new-yorks-attorney-general-of-physical-abuse …
-
It cannot be "clearly true" without evidence. Right now it is just words on paper until they are validated Anyone can say anything. Reporters are not investigators. They are authors and writers.
-
But do you take the words of Trump accusers without paper proof?
-
Great point!Shows the hypocrisy of the left-OK to trash a persons life on heresay unless the person being trashed is a Democrat.Can u spell Stormy Daniels?CNNs newest obsession is a porn star who cries foul when there’s $$ to be made & it suits CNNs agenda to destroy Trump!
-
Um, we all know Schniderman's a dem, that's the point, no one is above the law. Tick tock Trump.
-
Many folks didn’t know he was a democrat.That assumption is ridiculous.
-
You're kidding me. There's been a lot riding on the info he has against Trump's dealings in NYC because a state case can be tried separately from a federal. That's why people feel like this is a hit job. Do try to keep up.
-
Is that why Cuomo (the Democratic highly liberal Gov of Ny) asked for his resignation? Is he in on it too? Puleeze!
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.