Time for my periodic public callout of @UMG, who claimed this video, specifically the song starting at 13:43, an extremely clear-cut example of fair use, as the discussion is the lyrics of the claimed song. There's subtitles and everything.https://youtu.be/xU1ffHa47YY?t=823 …
-
-
Because $
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because that's the easily and readily abused policy that Youtube has had no problem using for going on years now. There's an entire cottage industry of stealing ad revenue from youtube videos, cause they'll pretty much rubber stamp *any* claim of infringement at this point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because that's apparently something Youtube thinks makes any sense
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"We have reviewed our actions and have decided that we are completely in the right!"
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
By not getting too involved YouTube is dodging legal accountability. Not an unwise strategy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because a human at UMG didn't make the claim; it's just automated that any portion of a song they have rights to will automatically create a claim.
-
Regardless of that, how is it fair for the one who filed the claim to be the one to review the appeal? Are they suddenly going to change their minds? An actual person at YOUTUBE should be the one to review appeals. Period.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.