Our response to this pandemic is based on science, data and best public health recommendations. We just launched a new detailed COVID-19 Data Tracker, providing significantly more public information on the situation in San Francisco as it evolves: https://www.sfdph.org/dph/alerts/coronavirus.asp …
-
Where can we find the science and data that you're using to inform the response? Thank you!
The tracker is hosted on the DPH site. Here's a direct link too:https://data.sfgov.org/stories/s/fjki-2fab …
-
-
The tracker is awesome. Thank you for putting this together. So far less than 1% of SF population got tested. Is this enough to have a clear picture of the situation?
-
I think so far they've only test people deemed sick enough for the test, although I believe that's changing with more testing being made available for healthcare workers (and possibly other essential workers?). I believe the new test site for that can do 200 a day.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is data tracking cases, thanks. Looking for more insight on how it’s being used in conjuction with science/city specific data to inform future projections
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So far, modeling projections have been way off base and even recent readjustments may still be too high. There may be flawed assumptions shaping the inputs in these projections; how are new understandings of the disease + other city data changing the projections?
-
Example: if a city has a huge number of diabetics, you might expect a higher rate of hospitalizations/deaths. How is known health data shaping the policies for SF?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.