A proposal that was just announced by members of the Board expresses to have the same goals, but includes key differences that will limit our ability to actually build these projects compared to my proposal.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Here’s how their proposal differs: -Severely limits the number of sites where affordable housing can be built. -Excludes affordable housing for middle-income residents who are struggling. -Doesn’t apply to teacher housing projects SFUSD has proposed, like at Francis Scott Key.
Show this thread -
We can’t keep limiting ourselves when it comes to housing. Affordable housing and teacher housing are too crucial to let the failed policies of the past get in the way. We have to be bold and serve all San Franciscans who are struggling to afford housing.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you Mayor Breed! Surprised you don’t also mention that, without your Charter Amendment, the city’s 100% affordable projects would risk being delayed for years by lawsuits.
-
The Charter Amendment does not get rid of lawsuits
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is a good idea. You should consider taking it a step further. Streamline the production of all housing. The City needs more of all types of housing.
-
where you at @NewWayCA ?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is a good thing, Madam Mayor. Thx.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
So fast? The warriors stadium has been going through planning since *2012*
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.