-
-
-
As a resident, you have a SAY. Our Supes and Mayor don’t have most vulnerable residents’ interests in mind. There’s a low income house across the street from Pier 32. Elderly & disabled who live there already afraid to go to Embarcadero as benches are used for sleeping and using
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No Mayor you need to ask D6 residents if they support this. D6 has been disproportionately affected and you out of all people should understand the consequences. D6 is a very open community, but we need to see other districts picking up their share first.
-
Sounds like D5 might be int the running. I own a business there and absolutely support it
@VallieBrownD5
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No. The rest of the city needs to support this. The East, Central are bearing this while the rest of SF does NOTHING. There are plenty of other spaces than D6/D10.pic.twitter.com/ZgZbe15kZg
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No more of this in D6. Build temp fema style housing or microPADS on vacant city lots. immediate fix would be allowing them to camp on city land as was going to be done previously. I’m tired of taking my life into my hands trying to keep my area safe and clean.
#reclaimingmyhood -
Agreed: my beef is camping In public spaces, like parks and streets. A nice courtyard surrounded by get healthy assistance and also the SIS would make all happy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is not a wise plan and shows the naivety off the leadership! No world class city has housing for homeless in its water front. This will attract more violence and illegal activities in the neighborhood. A proper strategy should be developed before such plans are considered.
-
This prior assessment seems to say that Mayor’s proposal has a dubious legal ground.pic.twitter.com/C76NcyNf22
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.