No. London , we need much more affordable than we need market rate. We also need a way to keep more people housed. I would love to see you spend a day at Baya Area Legal Aid, or the Eviction Defense Collaborative talking with people losing their homes. But you won't.
Building new market-rate housing helps us fund our affordable housing pipeline. If we're going to address our housing crisis, we need much more of both.https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/SF-s-affordable-housing-projects-hit-hard-by-13621283.php …
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You're sensible plan to speed up the planning process for affordable housing should also be applied to market rate housing. Limit the time for filing objections to approved projects to 30, 45, 60 or 90 days. The staff than can see and resolve all objections at the same time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
People are being pushed out already. Building net-positive units of housing (market-rate or affordable) is the only way to prevent SF becoming Hong Kong and all poor people being pushed out.
- 4 more replies
-
-
-
Build new housing for teachers, seniors, bus drivers!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lower the affordable housing requirements per market rate investment, and more market rate and affordable housing will be built. Get rid of folks in
#sfbos who don’t understand economicsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No sense trickle down has proven to be false
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.