Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
Lollardfish's profile
David M. Perry
David M. Perry
David M. Perry
Verified account
@Lollardfish

Tweets

David M. PerryVerified account

@Lollardfish

Journalist and historian. Pub musician. Dad. Husband. I also do dishes. My book: #TheBrightAges https://bit.ly/3x8L8nP . Subscribe: http://patreon.com/lollardfish .

Twin Cities
davidmperry.com
Joined January 2010

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    David M. Perry‏Verified account @Lollardfish 10 Oct 2020

    It’s my understanding that the entire legitimate focus of the criticism on the 1619 project is on a couple of sentences in the middle of one of the essays. Is that still accurate without me having to read the latest “look what you made me do” bedbug op-ed?

    12:51 PM - 10 Oct 2020
    • 22 Retweets
    • 347 Likes
    • vissy ❄️❄️ doghair model 🌊🇺🇸 KLDominus Cici Cat Dad brian Emily Fairchild 🏳️‍🌈 Alex Vasilis Vassalos
    12 replies 22 retweets 347 likes
      1. David M. Perry‏Verified account @Lollardfish 10 Oct 2020

        By legitimate I mean: the first version of those sentences likely overstated the evidence and even as revised historians can genuinely disagree. With those couple of sentences. In the middle of an essay. Not even necessary for the thesis.

        2 replies 2 retweets 120 likes
        Show this thread
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Matthew‏ @Roland00Address 10 Oct 2020
        Replying to @Lollardfish

        (yes)

        0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. sam‏ @verysimple 10 Oct 2020
        Replying to @Lollardfish

        I think one point of major controversy has been based on something NHJ tweeted, and that wasn’t even In the essays.

        1 reply 0 retweets 18 likes
      3. sam‏ @verysimple 10 Oct 2020
        Replying to @verysimple @Lollardfish

        Oh god I just went over and skimmed and he’s basing it on an article published in QUILLETTE. Shouldn’t there be basic editorial standards that you need to cite sources that aren’t trash?pic.twitter.com/E6cLxdxH40

        0 replies 0 retweets 44 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. Polycule Dropout  🏳️‍🌈 🙄‏ @SJGrunewald 10 Oct 2020
        Replying to @Lollardfish

        Yeah, bad take, David, why is it so hard to believe that supporters of Donald Trump are very concerned about the truth and accuracy?

        0 replies 0 retweets 14 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. This Tweet is unavailable.
      2. bIm‏ @0youngbs 10 Oct 2020
        Replying to @j_n_foster @Lollardfish

        The people still going on about it in bad faith are people who do not revise, only double down.

        0 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
      3. End of conversation
      1. Andrew Crain‏ @Andy_Crain 10 Oct 2020
        Replying to @Lollardfish

        Yes. And the authors have toned down those sentences.

        0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Catherine *Vaguely Hopeful* Campbell‏ @CampCat953 10 Oct 2020
        Replying to @Lollardfish

        It’s strange that he criticizes “journalists doing history” without mentioning all the articles written by historians. Which is far and away the bulk of the project. Did he even read “Traffic”?

        0 replies 0 retweets 20 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. harry cock roach hope account  🙏‏ @zrizzletheman 10 Oct 2020
        Replying to @Lollardfish

        what even was that sentence I keep hearing about it

        1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
      3. Hoydenne‏ @iridienne 11 Oct 2020
        Replying to @zrizzletheman @Lollardfish

        Hoydenne Retweeted kate dc

        https://twitter.com/katedc16/status/1315071565462208519?s=19 …

        Hoydenne added,

        kate dc @katedc16
        Replying to @katedc16 @Lollardfish
        They still object conceptually to characterizing the revolution as a defense of slavery - even though the authors didn’t say it was the *only* reason. Yes, that’s it. That’s the bulk of the criticism. As you rightly point out, not central to the thesis at all.
        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      4. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2021 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info