Yes, exactly. A settlement lets both sides get roughly acceptable outcomes. DD gets to operate, State (now Commerce) continues the reasonable component of their regulation, and small arms designs were universal anyway. Everyone saves court costs.
-
-
-
So explain what your actual point was again, since it's clear DD had no effect whatsoever on international arms trade or tech transfer?
-
(this is the part where we're back to that 3-way dialog path)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.