These are apples to oranges. This isn't a scalable analogy. You're comparing a force of 50k N hitting lumber/drywall to 21mil N hitting glass. That's 429x the force. This is silly, dude.
And this all happens without shattering the core visibly since the structure remained in-tact for quite some time after.
-
-
What's your premise? That 2 Boeing 767s DIDN'T fly into the WTCs?
-
I don't need an alternative to explain how the current explanatory model does not fit all the data. That's how science works.
-
Reminder that the buildings were designed to withstand impact of a 707, basically the same size as a 767. It wasn’t like the designers weren’t aware of the danger.
-
I’m not even arguing that airplanes singularly took down the WTCs, I’m just saying these things aren’t comparable; Nor do I know if
@LokiJulianus even believes if airplanes hit the towers in the first pace or not.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.