Dr Elizabeth Gadd

@LizzieGadd

Research Policy Manager (Publications); PhD in copyright & scholarly comms; Metrics Wonk; Librarian at heart. (She/her).

Loughborough
Vrijeme pridruživanja: lipanj 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @LizzieGadd

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @LizzieGadd

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    20. sij

    I pontificate about 's CRediT taxonomy in a piece for the Thanks to for encouraging me to put these thoughts out there & to & for reviewing an early draft.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The SciCV website will be launched on 1 March 2020. " The new format will no longer include any journal-based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors, as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles".

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 6 sati

    Another editorial board stepping down and cutting ties to for-profit publisher 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 Very sorry for your loss of the pink cover 😂 I’m confident in your ability to find another nice color 🔴🟠🟡🟢🔵

    Poništi
  4. prije 9 sati

    I’m a lifesaver-in-waiting. Join me! ⁦😊

    Poništi
  5. prije 10 sati

    It’s hard to comment on this. We (rightly) don’t have the detail. And bad things have been admitted to. But Codes of Conduct work both ways & I feel very uneasy about the way this has been handled.

    Poništi
  6. 5. velj

    Great stuff from “Sadly, like many prejudices, we often wait for change to come with the next generation and then it doesn’t. Unless we now make a concerted effort, things will remain the same.”

    Poništi
  7. 5. velj

    Friends, if you ever learn that I am considering a job in HR, please just say 'REF Staff Circumstances' to me. Thank you.

    Poništi
  8. 5. velj

    Am reviewing REF staff circumstances today. Just had my second sob in the ladies. It's not just the circumstances it's the paltry output reduction they are then entitled to. Such an insult. Tears of outrage mixed with tears of sorrow.

    Poništi
  9. 4. velj

    Disappointed to learn that the CWTS Quackathon had absolutely nothing to do with introducing a new water-fowl-based university ranking. Bad luck

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    . remains one of the awesome folks - especially when articulating the challenges of "measuring success" - as she explains, using ill suited metrics is problematic if we don't qualify what we as "success" when building our evaluation methods & tools

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    Everyone doing or affected by research evaluation should read this blog post by right now! 💯

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    This 👇 right here! Perhaps we are too busy chasing breakthroughs, that we forget to consider the capabilities and restrictions of our data

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    In this post, Dr. Elizabeth Gadd () weighs the pros and cons of defining contributorship in a more prescriptive fashion.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    Faut-il adopter la taxonomie CRediT pour distinguer les différentes contributions apportées à un article de recherche ? Étude des pour et des contre par via

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    We’re overjoyed at being ranked No.1 for our Carbon Neutral Closed Loop Collaborative Consumption Fair Trade Sustainable Canteen Facilities! 🎉

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    For the first time since leaving academia, I am consumed with envy: " I attended one of these workshops...About a hundred mostly sullen university employees".. The Disneyfication of a University | ACADEME BLOG

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    This is very irresponsible. ARU's position in the THE rankings is due to a near perfect score in the citations indicator and that is due to the participation of one researcher in the GBDS.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Utterly brilliant - I love Horrible Histories even more now.

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "Our project is illegal, but it’s the right thing to do in this crisis. We refuse to put copyright before human lives." People are using to freely but illicitly share more than 5,000 scientific articles on the

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    I’m at a total loss at what to do with all this extra Freedom and Sovereignty this morning

    Poništi
  21. 1. velj

    I can’t even bear the agony of turning the sound up on some of these news reports.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·